EXAMINE THIS REPORT ON CASE LAW ON SECTION 395 PPC CONVICTIONS

Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights even though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. About the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing while in the present case. In these kinds of circumstances, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon with the prosecution against the petitioner and his above mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined from the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.

These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, marketing a more informed and just society.

Some bodies are supplied statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

Reasonable grounds are available over the record to connect the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence. Though punishment with the alleged offence does not fall during the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. but discovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is while in the credit with the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls during the exception where bail cannot be granted even within the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, advice has actually been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion in the same is hereby reproduced:

Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of your grid project and submitted that enough mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to become crafted.

In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 with the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm into a person causes death of these types of person, possibly by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is alleged to commit qatl-i-khata.”

The law as proven in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

Please note, In case you are seeking a charge exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly. 

Finally, an important contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration with the Court under Article 184 (three), has become setting a precedent which allows for much a lot easier access into the public to method the superior courts as well as subordinate courts on environment related issues.

this Court is left with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion of your petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)

A decrease court may not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it truly is unjust; it may only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. When the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, more info it could possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of the cases; some jurisdictions allow for any judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.

fourteen. Within the light of the position explained above, it's concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be deemed for no fault of his individual and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency while in the duration of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more

Report this page